91Ó°ÊÓ

Tried and found guilty on a charge of public immorality, the VienneseÌýartist Egon Schiele (1890–1918) served a twenty-four-day prison sentence in April 1912. The initial charge, the kidnap and rape of the teenager Tatjana von Mossig, had been dropped, but in the process of investigating it the police had raided his studio and confiscated a series of erotic works, deemed pornographic.¹ÌýThe drawings, watercolours and gouaches, as well as other nudes from the period 1910–1912, have caused much debate ever since. Alessandra Comini is correct in saying that we must turn to the intellectual and cultural climate of Schiele’s Vienna to understand these images. However, her statement, ‘the elusive element that this Expressionist artist sought in his portraiture accurately mirrors the collective cultural quest of his time: the inner self – psychological man’ should be further nuanced to differentiate Schiele’s works from the fundamental Freudian definition of ‘psychological’.²

Broken down etymologically, psychology is the study of the soul or spirit, from the Greek ‘ψυχή (psychí)’. It is here that the first problem is encountered in much Schiele scholarship. There is a tendency to look for the ‘soul’ of the artist in the images he created, to read into the mottled flesh of his self-portraits the history of a syphilitic father, to perceive his ‘immorality’ in a woman’s splayed legs, or to uncover traces of his mother’s sorrow at her many stillbirths in the distorted figures of children. This article argues that this channel of enquiry so often taken by Schiele scholars is problematic. Can paint really contain the ‘soul’ of the artist? Instead, I propose to take on W. J. T. Mitchell’s recent (1996) challenge and use Schiele’s nudes as the basis for a ‘thought experiment’, questioning the idea of desire that is offered up by the images themselves, asking ‘what doÌý³Ù³ó±ð²âÌýreally want?’.³ÌýIn this endeavour, I would ask the reader for Mitchell’s suspension of disbelief.

The nudes of the period 1910 to 1912 likeÌýSeated Male NudeÌý(Fig. 1, 1910) orÌýBlack-Haired Nude Girl StandingÌý(Fig. 2, 1910), distinguished by their bold, pared-back linearity, appear to stand outside the model of the psyche created by Sigmund Freud, typically characterised by repression. These images allow, and often foreground sexual desire. Mitchell postulated an idea of images whose wants could be as numerous as the works they emanated from, though often they can be perceived as a lack.⁴ÌýIn the first part of this article, I would like to suggest that Schiele’s early nudes wish to capture the viewer through the visuality of sexual enjoyment and fulfilment. Viewed from this perspective, it becomes clear that Schiele’s works cannot be simply explained through use of Freudian theory.

However, turn-of-the-century Vienna was not a place in which the surface of society (or the surface of the paper) was intended to show such an unbridled social existence. It was supposed to be ‘a faultless, radiant façade’, yet behind the mirage of political and social stability flowed currents of prostitution, poverty, crime and social unrest.⁵ÌýThough the ruling classes might have wished to continue believing in the strength of the old Hapsburg regime, these undercurrents were fracturing the Austro-Hungarian Empire long before the First World War sealed its fate. By ignoring the convention of the facade, Schiele’s images are aligned with alternative currents of thought of the day, Freud’s thought included, that were breaking ties with the outlook of the nineteenth century, and the perceived civic failure with which this was connected. Reacting to his environment, Freud aimed to provide what he considered to be the foundation for an a-historical view of the psyche removed from concepts of class and societal norms.⁶ÌýIn this way, Schiele’s images are connected to Freud more subtly than the later twentieth- and twenty-first-century application of psychoanalytic theory to the works makes clear. These figures deny society’s hold over them by appearing in a void. Stepping beyond this boundary,ÌýSeated Male NudeÌýseems to reject not only society but also the very laws of science. The chair – a societal prop – having been removed, he is supported by and suspended in emptiness.

Challenging Mitchell’s hypothesis that images are not reducible to language, especially in light of their own desires, this article then considers Schiele’s nudes in relation to a different channel of Viennese thought: the turn-of-the-centuryÌý³§±è°ù²¹³¦³ó°ì°ù¾±²õ±ðÌý(language crisis) and, ultimately, Ludwig Wittgenstein’sÌýTractatus Logico-Philosophicus,Ìýfirst conceived of in 1913. In this seminal text Wittgenstein was grappling with the idea of how to make the nature of our thoughts clear. In a comparably perilous act, Schiele’s images seem to be trying to find a way to express clear or overt sexuality. Similar to Wittgenstein’s deconstruction of language into component cells, the sparse, linear figure that the nudes of 1910-1912 offer up is broken down into geometric blocks of flesh, where sexuality becomes a tangible component. ±õ²ÔÌýFemale NudeÌý(Fig. 3, 1910) the truncated figure is constructed of delineated shapes and sharp brushstrokes. The hexagonal face rests in a halo of broad purple, red and pink lines, the circle of the stomach is cupped in pink highlighting and divided in two, balanced precariously on a triangle of dark pubic hair. There is no attempt to fully integrate the various parts of the body. Instead, the thick white outline both highlights the angular collection of parts and prevents them from falling apart on the page.

The figure seems to exhibit no inhibition, the image bares itself fully to the viewer. The purple of her stocking tops mimics the triangle of the vagina, creating aÌý³¾¾±²õ±ð-±ð²Ô-²¹²úî³¾±ðÌýof sexuality.⁷ÌýThis is a productive example of Mitchell’s suggestion that an image can want mastery over the beholder, that it might desire to change places with him or her, holding the viewer still in what he terms ‘the Medusa effect’.⁸ÌýThe onlooker’s gaze is trapped by the image between its purple stockings and its red-purple halo of wild, almost snake-like hair. In Freud’s writings the Ego (or the conscious) is responsible for the processing of perceptions and excitations coming from the exter­nal world.⁹ÌýIt is here that the balance betweenÌý±è±ô±ð²¹²õ³Ü°ù±ðÌý²¹²Ô»åÌýun±è±ô±ð²¹²õ³Ü°ù±ðÌýis regulated through the repression of certain excitations deemed too strong for the maintenance of the mental equilibrium. The Ego acts as the border between internal and external perceptions, both of which leave traces that become memory in the unconscious.¹⁰ÌýThe Id exists in two forms: the latent thought that can become conscious without aid and the repressed thought that can only become conscious through the aid of psychoanalysis.¹¹ÌýAll repression stems from the socially aware Ego, developed through the repression of infantile sexuality, originally overt and free, which is incompatible with social reality.¹²

It is clear from his writings that Schiele was aware of the fluidity of Freudian boundaries within himself and within his reactions to the world around him. In his prison diary he wrote:

Have adults forgotten how corrupted they themselves were as chil­dren – that is, how incited and aroused they were by the promptings of sex? And, while they were still children, what terrible passion burned within them and tormented them? I have not forgotten, for I suffered dreadfully from it.¹³

Schiele acknowledges a certain ‘un-repression’ in himself. In the same way, his nudes offer the viewer images of their bodies freed from the binding social conventions that forbade open displays of sexuality.

Let us considerÌýMale Nude SeatedÌýin this way. A number of stud­ies see Schiele’s use of truncation of the limbs in his portraits as a sign of the artist suffering from a castration complex.¹⁴ÌýHowever, if we ask what the ‘nude man’ wants, then this fear of dismemberment is challenged by the placement of the truncated limbs. The viewer’s gaze is led from the pungent pubic hair and the genital area along the legs, which become an extension and multiplication of the sexual self: rather than being a sign of castration, they mimic the shape of the phallus. The transformation of the limb into an object with sexual potential shifts the socially accept­able status of the leg into the habitually socially-repressed sexual realm. This energy extends along the thighs towards the space of the external gaze, as though the figure is inviting the viewer to enter the visual field and indulge in similar freedoms. When viewed from this perspective Schiele’s charge of public indecency seems more complex. He had let loose in the world a multitude of characters who all had the power to invite supposedly respectable citizens to join them in unrepressed and unbounded expressions of desire. As the artist he might be charged with aiding and abetting, but was he the perpetrator?

Rather than try to read Schiele’s desires into this watercolour, it is more worthwhile to consider how Freudian theory can illuminate this visuality of desire. ±õ²ÔÌýBeyond the Pleasure PrincipleÌý(1920) Freud proposes that all humans share an inherent instinct that urges them to return to an earlier state of things, the initial state of being, before life. Thus, the repressed aim of all life is death – the death drive or ‘Thanatos’ drive. The drives that do not seek to restore an earlier state are the pleasure drives or ‘Eros’ drives; these seek the sexual satisfaction ofÌýjouissance, though they can be sublimated to find satisfaction in non-sexual achievement. They are the constructive instincts that balance the destructive instinct of Thanatos.¹⁵

±õ²ÔÌýMale Nude SeatedÌýthe use of clear geometric shapes holds the gaze at the genitals, caught in the abdominal circle, then draws the eye up the body through the triangle of the ribcage to the more prominent triangle created by the red of the nipples and the eye, where the viewer comes to rest. Perhaps we can think of this as a movement beyond the Freudian pleasure principle into a state of unbalance usually modified by the repression of excess excitation.¹⁶ÌýThis is a visual encoding of the state ofÌýunpleasure. According to Freud, the divided human psyche would attempt to repress this, but the figure’s arms embrace the sensa­tion. Society found Schiele’s figures so difficult to accept because they showed what a place beyond the social ‘pleasure principle’ might look like. What Freud called the psychological and explored through language, Schiele made visual – in his works the study of the illusive ‘psyche’ could be replaced with the study of the body and its desires.

Historically, feminist art history has considered the nude repre­sentation of women as passive objects of the male gaze.¹⁷ÌýThat could be one way of readingÌýBlack Haired Girl with Raised SkirtÌý(Fig. 4, 1911), in which the figure freely offers up her body to the viewer. However, situated within Schiele’s wider oeuvre, perhaps we can com­plicate conventional assumptions about the gendered gaze. For instance,Ìý·¡°ù´Ç²õÌý(Fig. 5, 1911) foregrounds male nudity and sexuality as the object of the spectator – the grey cloak framing the bright orange and red of the penis in the same way as the girl’s blue-black skirt frames the bright pink of her vagina. It remains unclear whether the artist envisaged a gendered gaze in this situation. I would argue that the ambivalence in his work surrounding the issue problematises the traditional western gendering of representation in feminist discourse. Schiele represents an unbounded sexual openness belonging equally to men and women.

Returning to the subject at hand, what exactly do we mean by making desire visual? Nudity was not a new concept in art. Botticelli’sÌýThe Birth of VenusÌý(1484–1486) rising from the waves is naked, Titian’sÌýVenus of UrbinoÌý(1538) naked, Goya’sÌýMaya DesnudaÌý(1797–1800) had her clothes ripped from her body. However, in all these instances the figures in the images still block the vagina from the penetrating gaze of the beholder, either with their hands or their thighs.ÌýThe Black Haired GirlÌýwith Raised SkirtÌýin contrast sheds any means by which this might be denied to the viewer. Her hands disappear into the emptiness of the paper, and her skirt frames her vagina, mirroring the blue-black aureole of hair around her face. The equation of the two is further highlighted by the use of rose pink to pick out the lips and the labia. However, the head is marginalised. It is smaller than the circle of flesh revealed by the raised skirt and placed high on the paper. This allows for the vagina to be the initial focal point. The composition is inviting the gaze to rest on her vagina. The image visually constructs the figure’s desire to be sexually touched and again the viewer is caught by the ‘Medusa effect’.

When Gemma Blackshaw says that ‘Schiele’s practice was not … that of the voyeur, peeking through the curtain, at the woman unawares; rather the female body was represented as continually reacting to that of the artist spectator’ she is iterating a related notion.¹⁸ÌýThe figures on the page act on and react to the viewer, giving desire a visuality. The portrait becomes the visual ‘performance’ of a new un-repression of desire.

Any discussion of repression and expression of desire within Schiele’s portraits would not be complete without consideration of his repeated representations of the cadaverous or sick. In line with tradition­al Freudian scholarship Jane Kallir says that this fascination stems from Schiele’s family history: his father was syphilitic, a disease passed on to his wife who, as a result, suffered a number of stillbirths.¹⁹ÌýI should stress that I do not wish to deny or refute such a claim, but I will consider the entanglement of sex, death and life in his work rather than his biography.

In Schiele’s drawings the focus on death and the disintegration of flesh betrays another step ‘beyond the pleasure principle’, incorporat­ing a representation of the state of the body once its flesh has begun to decay into pictures of unrepressed desire. Though Freud opposes the sex drive to the death drive, for Jacques Lacan all drives are sex drives and all drives are death drives because every drive is excessive, repetitive and ultimately destructive.²⁰ÌýThe death drive is the constant desire in the subject to break through the pleasure principle to achieve excessÌýÂá´Ç³Ü¾±²õ­²õ²¹²Ô³¦±ð;ÌýjouissanceÌýbecomes the path to death and insofar as every drive is an attempt to reachÌýjouissanceÌýevery drive must be a death drive. In this respect, the combining of the two drives in Schiele’s figures brings them closer to a Lacanian model of the psychical drives.

Kathryn Simpson writes aboutÌýSelf portrait in Black Cloak MasturbatingÌý(Fig. 6, 1911), ‘Schiele pictures himself doomed by Eros and Thanatos together, coiled tightly like a snake about to execute a lethal strike … where he appears as some kind of neutered vampire’.²¹ÌýSetting aside the idea that this ‘is’ the artist, and considering that the ultimate goal of the subject is, according to Freud, the unity of the body with both Eros and Thanatos, can we really see this figure as doomed? Rather, is this not a representation of theÌýjouissanceÌýbrought about through the death and sexual drives? The pale, mottled greens, ochre and grey of the flesh come together with the less translucent tones of the genital area between his hands. The movement in this work seems to compress the figure. The curve of the head into the body on the left and the oval brush work on the stomach that creates the sensation of the spine sink­ing both enhance the tension of the body, which can be seen teetering on the edge of dual release – the pleasure of death and theÌýun±è±ô±ð²¹²õ³Ü°ù±ðÌýofÌýjouissance. Eros and Thanatos are encrypted and un-concealed in paint, leaving iconographic traces on the figure on the paper.

±õ²ÔÌý·¡°ù´Ç²õÌý(Fig. 5) the fusion of the two drives is iconographically more pronounced. The face has become more skull-like – Schiele’s distinctively pointed nose has lost its cartilage and all that remains are the holes in the bone, thinly veiled in greying skin – aÌýmemento moriÌýmade man. The flesh is closer to decomposition; the light wash gives the impression of it disintegrating into the background, the hand and cloak becoming almost indistinguishable – flesh becoming inorganic matter. The legs – which, as with the truncation inÌýMale Nude SeatedÌý(Fig.1), can be seen as extensions from the phallus rather than a ‘castra­tion’ of the subject – and the lining of the cloak seem to intertwine. In this picture of decomposition the bright orangey pink of the phallus draws the viewer’s gaze. Because this is such a clear focal point, the rest of the work is relegated to the role of a frame for the visually encoded sexual drive. The more powerful death drive is balanced by the physical and visual prominence of the Eros drive lauded by the piece’s title. As withÌýBlack Haired Girl with Raised SkirtÌý(Fig. 4),Ìýthe framing within the work traps the viewer and invites the gaze to ‘touch’ the figure’s genitals: once again the viewer is caught between the figure’s desire to ‘paralyse’ the beholder, and the figure’s desire to spur him or her into movement. Both drives thus combine in an image of jouissance and decomposition, a complicated depiction of a dual pictorial desire.

Schiele’s drawings are figures who give visuality to sexual desire. In answering the question ‘what do these pictures really want?’ there is no need for recourse to the personal history of the artist. In these instances the viewers are caught up by what we may term the ‘subjectiv­ity’ of the painted figure, their gaze is brought into a sexual game. The figures want satisfaction and ask for it openly through the composition of their bodies and iconographic encryptions of abandon, pleasure and pain. This visualisation of these desires separated these drawings from a society whose stability depended on repression. Though we might use Freud to understand Schiele himself, to confuse the works and the artist is to ask more of the viewer than even Mitchell dares. Similarly, Comini’s statement that Schiele sought to portray ‘psychological man’ oversteps the mark. However, it is possible to argue that elements that were also found in Freud’s model for the ‘psyche’ are captured icono­graphically in paint. Taken beyond the psychological confines of their creator, these works could be used more freely in examinations of fin-de-siècle Viennese culture, ideas on sexuality, or gender roles to name but a few possibilities.

With these first thoughts in mind, I would like to address a different aspect of Mitchell’s essay – the idea that pictures want equal rights with language but not to be turned into language. However, pre­viously in his ‘thought experiment’ he had come to the conclusion that the ‘picture as subaltern makes an appeal or issues a command whose precise effect and power emerge in an intersubjective encounter com­pounded of signs of positive desire and traces of lack or impotence’.²²ÌýThe Oxford English Dictionary, under its entry for ‘language’ includes the definition ‘a style or method of expression in a non-verbal artistic medium such as music, dance, or the visual arts’.²³ÌýBy ascribing sub­jectivity to the picture Mitchell also ascribes them with the power of expression, a language of sorts, in his case made up of ‘signs’ and ‘traces’. I wish to extend my own ‘thought experiment’ to demonstrate that, though there will always be parts of a picture that defy comprehension or translation, there are integral visual elements of ‘language’ that allow us to ascribe a kind of ‘subjectivity’ to the image.

To do so, I will not turn to Structuralism, which has been widely deployed in twentieth-century art analysis, but to a further channel of thought that emerged in Vienna at the turn of the century – theÌý³§±è°ù²¹³¦³ó°ì°ù¾±²õ±ðÌýand a new philosophy of language. As a product of the same intellectual and cultural climate, I believe that this a more appro­priate ground for my exploration. TheÌý³§±è°ù²¹³¦³ó°ì°ù¾±²õ±ðÌýfirst began to appear in cultural and linguistic theory in the last decades of the nineteenth century, and centred on the idea that language could no longer be used adequately to describe abstract concepts or the nature of the world. Friedrich Nietzsche encapsulated the beginning of this crisis of faith in 1878: ‘It is only now that it is dawning on man that he has propa­gated an enormous error with his belief in language’.²⁴ÌýIn 1902 Hugo von Hofmannsthal took this idea further in the ‘Lord Chandos Letter’, which detailed the gradual loss of trust in language, starting with words such as ‘spirit’, ‘soul’ and ‘body’. The arbitrary connection of the word to the object became an insurmountable problem, and the body became the focus of much discussion of this issue as the place in which the individual and the linguistic universals converged.²⁵

Michael Hunter suggests this emphasis on the body can be seen as Vienna’s desire to communicate ‘what is too big, too general, too close to be expressed in words’.²⁶ÌýThe younger generation of writers and art­ists became obsessed with a language and an aesthetic that had a strict claim to authenticity – they wanted a marriage of fact and expression. This endeavour affected Schiele’s practice, as well as that of contem­poraries such as Oskar Kokoschka.²⁷ÌýIn the same way that they can be seen to visually project elements of sexual desire closely connected to contemporary psychoanalytic channels of enquiry, Schiele’s portraits arguably contain a system of pictorial signs analogous to the ‘logical lan­guage’ posited by Wittgenstein in theÌýTractatus Logico-Philosophicus,Ìýwhich, though published in 1921, was first conceived of and drafted in 1913.

Wittgenstein was concerned with the conditions that would have to be fulfilled by a logically perfect language. He was aware that such a language was a technical impossibility, but the nature of language is such that it only fulfills its purpose of conveying meaning insofar as it approximates to the ideal language postulated. Essentially, he believed that the function of language was to assert or deny facts. The first req­uisite of such a language was that there should be one name for every ‘simple’ object. The name would be the symbol for the object in lan­guage. A name was a ‘simple’ symbol because it could not be reduced further. When something is not a simple Wittgenstein termed it a whole or ‘complex’, which contained the symbols for the constituent parts. In the material world a complex is a fact. He defined two types of fact: a non-compound fact was known as aÌýSachverhaltÌýor ‘atomic fact’, and a compound fact was known as aÌýTatsache.ÌýThe example used in Bertrand Russell’s introduction to the text is that of ‘Socrates was a wise Athenian’. This contains the facts ‘Socrates was wise’ and ‘Socrates was an Athenian’ and is, therefore, aÌýTatsache.ÌýThe fact ‘Socrates was wise’ is an atomic fact orÌýSachverhalt,Ìýthough it is still a complex rather than a simple as it contains the different symbols, ‘Socrates’ and ‘wise’.²⁸ÌýSchiele’s portraits and the subjectivity they develop can be expressed within the tenets of Wittgenstein’s general premise. The desires expressed can be broken down and thought of as the ‘facts’ of the figures, underlining the nature of what they really want.

Let us return toÌýBlack Haired Girl with Raised SkirtÌý(Fig. 4) and deconstruct our previous visual analysis of the figure’s desires along Wittgenstein’s lines. As was observed, there is a broad circle of blue-black paint that surrounds a small, deep pink area. We can translate these two images into the sentence ‘the skirt frames the vagina’ (this is not to claim that the image and the word are interchangeable, but for the purpose of thinking about the image as a form of language such a translation is necessary). For Wittgenstein this would be an ‘atomic fact’, on the paper it is the unalterable composition of these two components of the image. We can create further ‘atomic facts’: the hair frames her face; the skirt mirrors the colour and shape of the hair; the lip colour matches the labia colour. All of these are unalterable parts of the image.

When we ask ‘what does the image want’ these are the ‘facts’ that enter into the response. As Wittgenstein did with language, the viewer has to break down the images to their component parts, into the indisputable elements before they can go beyond the surface of the paper and postulate a response to the question. Only once this has occurred can the viewer move into the realm that Mitchell saw as a ‘suspension of disbelief ’, or Wittgenstein would have termed an impos­sibility – the point at which these elements are ascribed a further mean­ing, a subjective meaning. In this respect Mitchell and Wittgenstein were proposing very similar ‘thought experiments’ to their audience: a technically impossible move from objecthood to subjectivity.

We can begin to see ‘the skirt frames the vagina’ as an indica­tion of sexual desire because of our knowledge of other facts in the world, such as ‘Boticelli’s Venus hides her vagina’, and facts specific to the image, such as ‘the viewer’s gaze rests on the vagina’. We build up the ‘truth’ of what the image wants by performing an act very close to Wittgenstein’s linguistic analysis. By comparing and contrasting various ‘facts’ we come to the conclusion that Schiele’s images are asking some­thing different of the viewer to other nudes. This is the body ‘showing’ its sexual desire. Such a process is only possible if we consider that the image has a semiotic function of its own. In his analysis of what pic­tures want Mitchell implicitly accepts this whilst explicitly denying it.

Experimenting with visual ‘facts’ can be extended further to compare versions of sexual desire displayed by different images. For example, inÌýBlack Haired Girl Nude StandingÌý(Fig. 2) the carefully spaced use of rose pink creates a rhomboid between the mouth, nipples and vagina. Wittgenstein uses the geometric shape as a visual metaphor for the simple as it exists in different languages – it can be projected in many different ways, but its inherent properties will always remain the same. The shape in the image guides the viewer’s gaze over the body; moving from the objecthood to subjectivity we can say that the image ‘wants’ to be touched by the beholder. Schiele’s use of white heightening around the girl’s outline further delineates the figure from the background. This is in line with Wittgenstein’s proposition that ‘a spatial object must be situated in infinite space’.²⁹ÌýThe absence of all extraneous material in the watercolour focuses the viewer on the ‘facts’ of the body and its desires.

±õ²ÔÌýNude Girls RecliningÌý(Fig. 7, 1911) the lower figure contains the same rhomboid configuration seen inÌýBlack-Haired Nude Girl Standing,Ìýwith the pink detail on the pubic bone, the nipples and the mouth. However, inÌýNude Girls RecliningÌýa second rhomboid can be seen, created by the lower nipple of the prone girl, the visible nipple of the propped-up figure and their two mouths. A comparison of the differ­ent rhomboids in the two pictures opens up our questioning into want the pictures want. Where one rhomboid appears the image’s subjective sexual desire is projected out at the viewer. Where two rhomboids inter­act on the paper the relationship is more complex. Are these rhomboids inviting the viewer’s gaze to roam over their bodies as an active com­ponent in the visual game, or are they depicting a mutual desire for one another that the viewer witnesses passively?

In the dialogue between the images and between image and viewer we start to build up an understanding of what the images might want. In the case of Schiele’s nudes this is, for the most part, sexual desire. In fin-de-siècle Vienna this was a complex notion. Schiele’s arrest for public indecency in 1912 indicates that his contemporaries, like so many art historians of more recent years, felt that the images were a reflection of the artist’s character or psyche. However, attempts to psychoanalyse Schiele through his works will always be problematic. This thought experiment has attempted to move away from this and to open up Schiele’s works to a new avenue of exploration. By taking these works beyond the psychological confines of their creator they can begin to play a much more interesting part in a consideration of sexuality in fin-de-siècle Vienna than might otherwise be the case. They become part of the wider dialogue surrounding the breakdown of the faultless façade of Viennese society.